|
Home|
Postal News
|
Your Rights |
PostalMall |
Commentary |
Resources |
Links |
About |
What's New |
Search
POSTAL NEWS
|
Internal crime duties to
switch to Office of Inspector
General
posted 9/10/04
Until the Office of Inspector
General was created in 1997,
the Postal Inspection Service
also served as the USPS
Inspector General. The Act
creating the OIG changed this,
and the two organizations have
been working under an agreed
“designation of functions” —or
division of duties — for the
two organizations.
Under that designation of
functions, the mission of the
Inspection Service
is to protect the Postal
Service, its employees and its
customers from criminal
attack, and protect the
nation's mail system from
criminal misuse. The OIG’s
role is to conduct and
supervise objective and
independent audits, reviews
and investigations relating to
Postal Service programs and
operations by preventing and
detecting fraud, waste and
misconduct.
An ongoing review of the
duties of the two groups has
found that the 1997 agreement
needs to be revisited for the
sake of organizational clarity
and to assure that the
statutory mandates for both
organizations are being
fulfilled.
As a result, to be consistent
with Congressional intent, the
Postal Service, the Inspection
Service and the Office of
Inspector General are planning
to shift appropriate internal
crimes duties to the OIG. The
Inspection Service will focus
its efforts on areas of
responsibility Congress has
designated as within its
exclusive jurisdiction.
A transition team, with
representatives of the OIG and
the Inspection Service, will
work over the next one to two
years to clarify
responsibilities and
facilitate the transfer of
duties. Steve Moe, an
experienced USPS executive
familiar with the work of both
organizations, will lead the
team. Moe has extensive
experience in Human Resources
and the Law Department.
|
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, FEDEX
EXPRESS BUSINESS ALLIANCE
(USPS.com)
"On March 16, 2004,
FedEx
Express entered into a fourth
addendum to its transportation
agreement with the U.S. Postal
Service, allowing
FedEx
Express to continue carrying
incremental pounds of mail
through November 30, 2004 at
higher committed volumes than
required under the original
agreement. Third Amendment to
Third Addendum dated December
8, 2003 and Fourth Addendum
dated March 16, 2004, each
amending the Transportation
Agreement dated January 10,
2001 between The United States
Postal Service and FedEx
Express. Confidential
treatment has been requested
for confidential commercial
and financial information,
pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under
the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended." (source:
Document filed with Securities
Exchange Commission)
Top 30 of 150 USPS
Suppliers 2003
FY
2003 Top 150 USPS Suppliers by
Payment Received
(pdf)
Rank|
Vendor| Amount Paid
1 Federal
Express Corporation,
Memphis, TN $1,074,806,512
FedEx starts talks with
pilots, hoping to avoid
another slugout
April 19, 2004 (AP)
FedEx and its pilots have
started negotiations over new
work rules, but both sides
hope to avoid a nasty fight
like the slugout four years
ago. "Both sides right now
understand that they have to
live with each other. They
realize also that a strike or
a conflict will hurt them
both," said Gary Chaison, a
professor of labor-management
relations at Clark University
in Worcester, Mass. Four years
ago, under the threat of
strikes and replacement
workers, FedEx and the
Air Line Pilots Association
settled the cargo
airline's first union contract
for U.S. employees. Now, that
contract can be amended. It
should help that this time
negotiators are working on an
existing contract. "So you're
working off of a basis of
something rather than starting
from scratch," FedEx
spokeswoman Sandra Munoz said.
The current contract took
effect in 1999 after years of
haggling between the pilots
and a company that has
consistently been averse to
organized labor.
The squabbling reached a
peak in December 1998 when the
pilots threatened to strike
during the Christmas shipping
season, raising worries around
the country for FedEx
customers. The strike talk
also stirred up hundreds of
non-flying
FedEx workers who rallied
in Memphis to support the
company, Tennessee's largest
private employer. The strike
talk ended when FedEx founder
Frederick W. Smith and other
senior managers began
preparing to lease planes and
flight crews from other
companies. Pilots agreed to
keep working and contract
negotiations resumed. Labor
negotiations at FedEx are
governed by the national
Railway Labor Act, meaning the
current work agreement remains
in effect until it is amended.
Under federal law, the pilots'
contract can be amended as of
May 31 and the new
negotiations got underway late
last month. "We're looking at
basically a week of active
negotiations every month
through the end of the year,"
said David Webb, chairman of
union's executive committee at
FedEx.
While the company's 4,100
pilots plan to ask for a pay
raise, their first concern is
"quality of life issues," Webb
said, "and specifically the
kinds of schedules they're
being forced to fly." Most
passenger airlines have faced
serious financial trouble
since the Sept. 11 attacks,
and some of the biggest are
cutting payrolls and seeking
major work concessions from
employees. But FedEx Corp.,
the parent of FedEx Express,
the world's largest cargo
airline, is making money.
"Under no circumstances will
we negotiate any concessions
in view of the extensive
profits FedEx has made," said
Webb, a pilot captain for some
of the company's biggest cargo
jets. FedEx offered only
general comments on the
negotiations. "What we're
looking for is a contract
that's fair for everyone, the
pilots, the other employees,
our customers and the
shareholders," Munoz said.
The pilots and the company
already disagree on key
matters likely to be at the
heart of the talks. The
company says the average FedEx
pilot makes $167,000 a year.
Webb said that figure is too
high, but he would not offer a
pay estimate to counter the
company's calculation. FedEx
also says its flyers get more
time off than federal rules
require and the average pilot
works 13 days a month. The
union, meanwhile, contends the
company often forces its
pilots to put in as many hours
as it can and gives them
little say on flight
schedules. "There's a
significant loss of control
once you begin a flight on
when you might come back ...
Under current work rules, the
company has the ability to
non-voluntarily extend you in
the field, basically for
indefinite periods of time,"
Webb said. FedEx flyers work
mostly at night and with the
company's international
business growing, some are
handling longer, more tiring
flights, Webb said. "We're
looking at how you
appropriately define hard work
as opposed to less hard work
to make sure the guys who are
really doing the yeoman's work
in this business are
adequately compensated," Webb
said.
While FedEx and the pilots
want to avoid the kind of
scraps they have gotten into
in the past, contract talks
can turn ugly regardless of
good intentions, said business
professor Chaison. "It's not
entirely a rational process
that we're dealing with," he
said. "Quite often there's an
emotional content to
bargaining, and the parties
try to impress on each other
their ability to inflict harm
if they don't get their way."
|
|
Update: Georgia District Manager
begins as Acting
Sacramento District Manager
on 3/29/04 -
|
Sacramento
Calif. USPS District Manager
Removed
NAPUS Member:
"As a result of the
investigation launched by
the Management Associations in the
Sacramento California District,
.. has been removed as the
Manager. Postmasters, Managers, &
Supervisors stepped forward and gave testimony in the matter of
the hostile environment in Sacramento. An ongoing investigation
is being held. Further information
will be posted."
|
Workplace Environment Issue
Being Addressed-Friday,
March 26, 2004 - I’ve been
informed by California State
President Norma Powell and
National Vice President
Charley Mapa that the Postal
Headquarters intervention team
is making progress in the
ongoing investigation in the
Sacramento District. The
District manager has been
removed from the position
while the investigation is
taking place. CA LEAGUE
officials have been working
with the District and Area for
well over a year, trying to
improve the workplace
environment in the Sacramento
District. We are pleased that
the LEAGUE’s efforts are
helping the situation get the
attention it deserves. We’ll
advise as developments occur.
--Steve D. LeNoir, LEAGUE
President
|
"USPS Headquarters informed
NAPUS President Wally Olihovik
that a change has been made in
the District Manager position
at the Sacramento California
District Office. Olihovik
praised the Postal Service for
taking a positive step to
improve the workplace climate
in Sacramento." source: NAPUS
(3/25/04)
|
THANK YOU
FOR YOUR COURAGE
"On behalf of the Sacramento
Focus Group (Think tank) -
Norma Powell & Rod Rodinsky
(League), Marilyn Walton (
NAPS), and Rick Burtzlaff,
Rich Webberson, & myself
(NAPUS), I'd like to
personally thank all the brave
Postmasters, Managers, &
Supervisors who stepped
forward and gave testimony in
the matter of the Hostile
environment in Sacramento. We
- YOU - were successful in
getting the deed done.
Congratulations! This only
proves that TOGETHER, WE CAN
DO WHAT WE CANNOT DO ALONE!
Thanks to everyone who did the
right thing and made it better
for their fellow members of
the Sacramento District! I am
extremely proud of all of you.
Now, the healing can begin."
Diana Barela |
NAPUS Member to
PostalReporter.com: one of the senior management officials
involved in the abuse of EAS employees in the Sacramento District
was the postmaster of Royal Oak, Michigan during the time of the
multiple shootings in the 1990s. (This rumor is buzzing all around
the Sacramento and Bay-Valley Districts). In addition, USPS has
started interviewing employees this week in the Sacramento District
surrounding the allegations against senior management officials.
(3/19/04)
|
USPS Headquarters Schedules Workplace Environment
Review for Sacramento District
download pdf file
March 2, 2004
Mr. Steve
LeNoir
President
National
League of Postmasters
of the
United States
1023 North
Royal Street
Alexandria,
VA 22314-1569
Mr. Wally
Olihovik
President
National
Association of Postmasters
of the
United States
8 Herbert
Street
Alexandria,
VA 22305-2600
Mr. Vince
Palladino
President
National
Association of Postal
Supervisors
1727 King
Street
Alexandria,
VA 22314-2753
Gentlemen:
As you are
aware, representatives of your associations in the Pacific Area have
requested a workplace environment
review of
the Sacramento District. Issues involving alleged mistreatment,
abuse, and intimidation on the part of senior
management
within the district have been raised in a recent letter to the
Postmaster General. An ongoing effort to
address
these treatment issues involving your local representatives has been
in place for approximately one year, focusing on building effective
working relationships. Apparently these efforts have not yet
resulted in any meaningful changes as viewed by the members of the
team, and they are now asking for a formal intervention by Postal
Service Headquarters.
Discussions about this request have been held with
senior management here at Headquarters, as well as with the
functional manager of these types of workplace intervention efforts
for the field. A determination has been made to assess the work
environment within the Sacramento District coordinated by Postal
Service Headquarters utilizing resources from outside the Pacific
Area. This assessment will most likely include confidential
interviews of management employees, and the development of
recommendations for addressing the concerns outlined in the letter
that can be implemented right away, as well as sessions on improving
leadership skills and communications that can set a benchmark for
future interaction between postmasters, managers, supervisors, and
senior management in the Sacramento District.
It is our intention to begin this effort shortly and
to keep an open line of communications with you and your
representatives during this assessment. We will provide periodic
updates to you as we move forward, and will share the final
recommendations for improving the working environment with you prior
to implementation. Please let me know if you have any questions or
concerns.
Sincerely,
Valerie E.
Martin
Manager
Labor
Relations
Policy
Administration |
SACRAMENTO PC POSTMASTERS/SUPERVISORS FEEDBACK REPORT
As most of you
know, about 18 months ago, the 3 Management organizations formed a
focus group – the “Think Tank” – to work on issues surrounding
service issues, cost containment and the work environment for the
EAS employees of the Sacramento District. However, the focus of the
group has concentrated mostly on the improvement of the work
environment as it was felt that this was the most pressing issue at
the time. Issues/concerns were gathered and presented to the
District Manager in hopes changes would occur.
The VOE surveys
continued to indicate that we were sliding in our efforts –
occasionally we saw improvements, but they were short lived at
best. In order to get additional information, we recently held 3
after hours sessions with the EAS and invited their input.
Approximately 100 Postmasters & Supervisors attended these
sessions. Unfortunately, it indicated issues far more disturbing
that we initially thought.
After the sessions
were complete and after many long hours of deliberation, we have
concluded that we faced a serious condition in the Sacramento
Performance Cluster. We found ourselves with a group of employees
we felt were at great risk. We have determined that the well being
of our employees is at stake and consider Sacramento PC to be a
Hostile Work environment.
Two primary issues
surface most – the Lack of Trust issues with constant fear of
discipline and the Perception of Unbearable Working Conditions.
Over the years,
linkage has been made between perceptions of an abusive environment
and acts of desperation, such as suicide or violence. Currently,
the environment in the Sacramento Performance Cluster is one of
hopelessness and despair for many EAS employees. We feel the
situation has reached a crisis point.
To that end, we,
the 3 management organizations, NAPS, NAPUS, & NLPM, produced a
report and cover letter, requesting that the parties at the national
level, including the PMG, request the OIG conduct an investigation
of the management style & practices of Mr. Francia. We also
requested that he be reassigned during the investigation so people
would feel free to testify. In addition, we requested that the Area
not intervene while the investigation was in progress.
To be successful in
this endeavor, when the OIG comes to do this investigation and I am
confident that they will - everyone needs to be candid and honest
and give testimony. It will do no good at all if folks do not step
up to the plate and be willing to testify to what is going on. I am
counting on all of you to help your fellow EAS in this regard.
Together, we can make the Sac PC a better place to work.
(source: NAPUS
Redding Calif. Chapter)
|
|
INVESTIGATION:
"U.S. Rep. William Lacy
Clay Jr. says he has begun an
investigation into why the Main
Post Office at 1720 Market Street
in St. Louis, MO has closed its
infirmary during most weekend
hours, when hundreds of workers
are busy sorting mail for Monday
deliveries. Some 2,400 work in the
building. St Louis Local APWU
President Roosevelt Stewart, "Mail
is flying all day and all night
long and there are accidents all
the time." A spokesman said he
could not say how many workers are
injured, but the infirmary
"doesn't have heavy use" on
weekends." -end-(source St
Louis Today)
|
|
TIME WARNER PROPOSAL WOULD RAISE
PERIODICALS' POSTAGE RATES
By David Straus, ABM Postal Counsel
February
24, 2004
American Business
Media has not yet been given the opportunity to respond to the
complaint filed at the Postal Rate Commission by Time Warner,
Newsweek, Readers Digest, TV Guide and Conde Nast. Now that the
Postal Service has filed its answer, in which it urged dismissal of
the complaint, the Commission has several options: 1) it can call
for a full-scale evidentiary hearing on the issues raised, 2) it
could dismiss the complaint and terminate the case, 3) it could
defer a ruling on the complaint until the next rate case, or 4) it
may call for comments by other affected parties before it does
anything. American Business Media believes the fourth option is the
most likely course.
To develop its
position and comments, American Business Media has been analyzing
the early results submitted by those ABM members that have
calculated the potential effect of the new rates proposed by Time
Warner and the others. Thus far, we have analyzed results for 41
typical American Business Media member publications. All 41
would pay increased postage under the proposal. In fact, 20 of the
41 would pay double-digit increases, and five would pay increases
between 50% and 81%. There is more work to be done, but it
appears that the single most important factor influencing how a
publication would fare under the proposed rates is pieces per sack,
which follows from the "sack charge" proposed.
(As previously
reported, Time Warner has provided a program to help you calculate
the postage effect of the proposed changes. We encourage you to
perform these calculations so that you can see the impact of the
proposal.
and write "Request for Alternate Rate
Calculator" in the subject line. Please note that you need Microsoft
Access and mail.dat files to use the tool.)
Although there is little chance that
the rate design in the complaint will be adopted any time soon, the
Postal Service's answer makes clear that it intends to move slowly
in that direction. American Business Media members should continue
to investigate ways to move from small sacks to larger sacks, and
from sacks to pallets. (source American Media Business) |
|
Minneapolis man charged with hacking into Post
Office Web server
The Associated Press - 02/21/2004
MINNEAPOLIS
A young
Minneapolis man who allegedly hacked into a Web server belonging to
the U.S. Postal Service has been indicted on computer fraud charges.
Joshua Linsk, 21, is charged with two counts of computer fraud and
one count of possessing 15 or more unauthorized access devices, the
U.S. attorney's office said.
A grand jury alleged that Linsk transmitted a code in May 2002 that
damaged a Web server database table owned by the U.S. Postal
Service, Office of Inspector General.
Linsk also was charged with accessing a computer maintained by
Whitney Education Group Inc. to obtain credit card account numbers
and related information. The indictment alleges that Linsk got more
than 15 credit card account numbers.
Linsk was arraigned Friday before U.S. Magistrate Judge Franklin
Noel and was released on a $25,000 unsecured bond.
|
|
Putting the stamp on mailers
Entrepreneur
thinks idea of boxes with postage just might fly
|
By CHERYL HALL / The Dallas Morning News
CARROLLTON – Joe Gaikoski
is making it easier to send good things in small packages. In the
process, he hopes his company gets many happy returns.
Last month, the 37-year-old
owner and president of Amerisource Packaging & Printing LLP launched EZ
Postage, billed as the "world's first postage-paid box."
It comes in two sizes – one
for $4.99 that snuggly holds a CD and a $5.99 model for a DVD or game
disc.
It's all about convenience.
Buy a gift and the postage-paid box, then drop the package in a mailbox
to any destination in the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii and
Puerto Rico.
Mr. Gaikoski guarantees
that his prepaid postage will cover its intended use. Use one to mail
metal parts, and you're on your own.
This is just the tip of the
iceberg, he promises. EZ Postage for books, photos and documents are
being developed.
The inspiration actually
came in an edict from his wife.
A little more than a year
ago, Roz Gaikoski spent a time-consuming morning buying a DVD for a
Christmas present, getting a card at the supermarket and then driving to
the post office, where she stood in line to buy a box and mail it.
"She said, 'You're in the
packaging business. There has to be a better way,' " Mr. Gaikoski
recalls.
Her challenge prompted him
to take another look at a DVD shipping box he'd already developed.
What if, Mr. Gaikoski
thought, he slapped stamps on those boxes and sold them to video and
music retailers?
When he didn't find
anything similar on the market, Mr. Gaikoski waded through U.S. Postal
Service guidelines and modified his boxes to meet its rules. Next, he
spent hours at a neighborhood Target weighing CDs and DVDs with a postal
scale to see how many stamps it would take to cover even the heaviest.
"No one ever asked me what
I was doing," he says with a chuckle. " Finding Nemo blew up all
that research when it came out. It had two discs, two books and
advertising, and weighed a gram more than anything else.
"So this is postage paid
for heavier than Nemo," he says, proffering a DVD mailer.
Patent attorney Tom Timmons
was skeptical when Mr. Gaikoski knocked on his door for legal help. "I
thought, 'This is so simple. It must have been done before,' " recalls
the Dallas attorney, who's been doing patent work for 29 years.
Before taking the job, Mr.
Timmons ran a routine patent search and a more thorough one on the
Internet. To his amazement, he found lots of patents for specialty
shipping boxes and packages but none with prepaid postage.
Netflix, for example, mails
subscribers its rental movie discs without the plastic covers in
metered-mail envelopes.
Mr. Timmons says he filed a
broad utility patent in September for any specialty package with prepaid
shipping – be it transported by U.S. mail, UPS or FedEx. Although the
U.S. Patent Office hasn't responded, he's "reasonably confident" that
"pending" will become "permanent" – but it could take six months to a
year.
In the last three months,
Mr. Gaikoski has sent nearly 500 videos, CDs and games to family and
friends to test the system.
"The beauty really hit home
with me the first time I walked out to the mailbox in my pajamas and
mailed Bruce Almighty to my sister-in-law in Honolulu," he says.
"It went out on Monday, and she called on Thursday to thank me for the
gift."
Ironically, the newness of
EZ Postage creates a sizable hurdle for Mr. Gaikoski, who has to
convince retailers that the postage-paid boxes will actually enhance
sales. Then consumers have to prove his hypothesis.
So far, a dozen major
retailers have expressed interest, including Wal-Mart Stores, which
asked for samples. The Army & Air Force Exchange Service and the parent
company of CD Warehouse are in the final stages of setting up tests but
haven't signed their deals yet.
"It's so easy, it's
difficult," says Mr. Gaikoski. "People can't understand why, if it's
such a great idea, it hasn't been done before."
Moving experience
This isn't the first time
Mr. Gaikoski has moved into uncharted entrepreneurial seas.
Joseph Greer Gaikoski was
born and reared in Akron, Ohio, the youngest of five children in a
blue-collar home of modest means.
The week he graduated from
high school in 1985, the Akron Beacon Journal ran a story about
186 people applying for two jobs at a local McDonald's. That was a clear
indication to the 18-year-old that it was time to head to Dallas, where
his father had moved after his parents divorced.
His first job was at Sysco
Food Systems unloading 100-pound sacks of potatoes.
"By the time I was 21, I
was the night manager at Sysco in charge of 70 employees," says Mr.
Gaikoski. "By the time I was 23, I was at Tuesday Morning as director of
distribution."
In June 1996, at the
encouragement of his late wife, Nancy, Mr. Gaikoski quit his $45,000
job, cashed in his 401(k) and took out a $1,000 cash advance on his
MasterCard to start a company that provided boxes and packaging
materials.
"We ate a lot of Kraft
macaroni and cheese and Ramen noodles that first year," he says.
The company, then called
ProTek Packaging, was doing well and had annual sales of about $1
million in 1998 when Nancy was diagnosed with breast cancer. She died
nine months later.
A grief-stricken Mr.
Gaikoski let his employees go and moved his company's operations into a
neighboring packaging company to concentrate on rearing his two young
children.
He emerged from his
business cocoon in November of 2001 after meeting and marrying Roz,
whose daughter sat next to his son in pre-kindergarten class.
He changed the company's
name to Amerisource in honor of 9-11.
How much that division will
bring in is a big question.
More testing
Mr. Gaikoski is in final
negotiations with Magnolia Entertainment LLC in Oklahoma City about
testing the boxes in CD Warehouses.
Magnolia vice president
Matt Allen likes the concept but has no idea whether it'll actually fly.
"I plan to test it in a small, a medium and a large market and see what
happens."
For one thing, Mr. Allen
worries that the product may be seasonal, and the holidays are over. "So
I'm not sure this is the best time to give it a try."
Still, he's intrigued.
Having an on-the-spot way to mail might spawn impulse purchases as well
as encourage customers who typically purchase gifts online to buy at the
store instead – and buy a box to boot.
Mr. Gaikoski has also heard
encouraging words from Dallas-based AAFES about putting the boxes in its
military stores.
His sales pitch to the Army
and Air Force stores, as well as to the Navy Exchange Command in
Virginia Beach, Va., is that his boxes are U.S. Postal Service-approved
and can be sent to bases anywhere in the world, including Iraq, without
additional postage.
The Postal Service, which
is undoubtedly pleased that someone wants to buy a bunch of stamps, is
considering putting the boxes in its vending machines, Mr. Gaikoski
says.
"I'll be totally shocked if
EZ Postage sales don't reach $3.5 million by the end of this year. But
then I'm passionate and excited," he says, half-heartedly trying to rein
in his zeal. "For example, if Blockbuster puts them in all of its stores
and just sells one box a day at each, that would be $32,725 a day," he
says, keying in an average wholesale price and multiplying by 8,500
stores.
Dennis Serratt, a retail
product broker for Professional Reps Group Inc. in Fort Worth, thinks
he's aligned with a winner.
In fact, he figures Mr.
Gaikoski's early estimates might be a little low.
"Once one major retailer
signs up, this is going to explode," predicts Mr. Serratt, who's been a
manufacturer's rep for 22 years. "By the end of next year, this is going
to be phenomenal." |
Numbers Show Direct
Mail Efficient and Effective
by Gene Del Poltio - President .
Association of Postal Commerce
from Startribune.com
After reading "Let's Face it: Direct mail
doesn't work" by Michael Nelson (Nov. 2, 2003), Star Tribune
readers might well believe that advertising mail is simply
the last choice in marketing.
Happily, there's more than $50 billion on
the table that says this isn't the case.
Nelson explains that "corporate America
will spend about $46 billion this year on direct mail, with
an average response rate of about 1 percent. ... That's a 99
percent-plus rejection rate, and it's simply not good enough
in today's economy."
Not good enough according to whom?
Let's use Nelson's standard and test
various media. For instance, does every ad in the Star
Tribune generate a 1 percent response? If not, should the
Star Tribune be smaller? Who should make such a decision?
What about ads on TV or in magazines?
Why would a local business, charity,
political candidate or government agency spend money on a
medium that doesn't work? Does that make sense to anyone?
Nelson says "the gross inefficiencies of
blasting out billions of pieces of junk mail to unknown
recipients must be taking its toll, as direct-mail volumes
are showing signs of decline for the first time in years."
Advertising expenditures reflect economic
trends. During the past few years the nation has been in an
economic holding pattern, so it follows that advertisers
adjust spending to fit the times.
For instance, according to Robert Coen,
senior vice president and director of forecasting with
Universal McCann, a leading advertising agency, $49 billion
was spent on newspaper advertising in 2000 -- an amount that
declined to $45.4 billion in 2003.
Coen also says that in 2000 a total of
$44.6 billion was spent on direct mail, $49.0 billion in
2003 and $51.5 billion will be spent in 2004. In effect,
advertisers now spend more money with mail than with
newspapers. Would that happen if advertising mail was
inefficient and ineffective?
Census Bureau figures show that the
national population climbed from 255 million in 1992 to 288
million in 2002, an increase of 33 million people.
During the same period, the Newspaper
Association of America says that in 2002, morning and
evening circulation totaled 55.2 million copies -- down from
60.2 million a decade earlier. One could argue that
newspapers are now "more efficient" because they serve a
larger population with less circulation. It's just a guess,
but somehow such "efficiency" is probably not the goal of
most publishers or ad departments.
Nelson repeatedly uses the term "junk
mail." According to the Washington Post, "newspapers have
been at war with advertising mailers for a long time -- ever
since the mailers began siphoning ad dollars away from
publications. Indeed, newspaper editorialists invented the
term 'junk mail' in the early 1950s, according to Richard
Kielbowicz, an associate professor of communications as the
University of Washington, Seattle, and an expert on postal
rate issues."
Nelson claims "the direct-mail industry
has been built on a mass production model, driven by tonnage
-- 5.2 billion tons last year, to be exact."
More than 5 billion tons? Really?
According to "Municipal Solid Waste in the
United States: 2001 Facts and Figures," a publication
produced by the Environmental Protection Agency and the
latest available edition, all municipal solid waste produced
in the United States amounted to "approximately 229.2
million tons" in 2001 -- a decrease of 2.8 million tons from
2000.
As for advertising mail, it totaled 5.4
million tons -- far less than the 12.2 million tons
represented by newspapers.
Here's a basic truth: The United States
has a huge and vibrant economy with a variety of advertising
channels. There's room for all media. As a country we need
our newspapers, we need our mail stream, and we need all
other media as well. Based on performance, advertisers will
decide which media works best to promote a given product,
service or nonprofit cause -- and that's the way it ought to
be.
Gene A. Del Polito is president of the
Association for Postal Commerce (www.postcom.org), an
organization that includes the nation's largest mailers.
|
Court Upholds USPS Prohibitions on Signature Solicitation
Conduct on Postal Service Property
- Prohibitions on Signature Solicitation
On December 31, 2003, the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia issued its decision in Initiative and Referendum
Institute v. United States Postal Service. The case challenged the
constitutionality of the Postal Service's prohibition against solicitation of
signatures for petitions, polls, and surveys on Postal Service property (see POM
124.54a). The court found that the prohibition was constitutional. Therefore the
prohibition is in full force and effect. The court's decision was conditioned on
publication of clarifying information about the regulation, in accordance with
the Postal Service's previous offer to do so.
Postmasters and other installation heads are reminded
about their obligations regarding enforcement of the Postal Service's
regulations governing conduct on Postal Service premises with respect to
activities in support of ballot initiatives and public referenda.
Please note that Postal Service regulations regarding
conduct on Postal Service property prohibit the solicitation of signatures on
petitions, polls, and surveys on Postal Service property. This prohibition
extends only to efforts to have members of the public provide signatures on
Postal Service premises, and not to communications that promote the signing of
petitions, polls, and surveys somewhere other than on Postal Service premises.
The regulations do not prohibit members of the public from engaging in other
forms of expressive activities on the exterior areas of Postal Service property
that are open to the public. For example, leafleting, distributing literature,
picketing, and demonstrating by members of the public are prohibited only in
lobbies and other interior areas of Postal Service property that are open to the
public. These activities are not prohibited on exterior areas of Postal Service
property, such as Postal Service sidewalks and parking lots.
Thus, if a petition circulator wishes to collect
signatures for a petition, poll, or survey, he or she would not be prohibited
from standing on exterior parts of Postal Service property that are open to the
public and passing out informational leaflets, holding up a sign, or both. The
leaflet or sign could provide relevant information about the petition, poll, or
survey, and direct Postal Service customers to nearby non-Postal Service
property, that is, property not under the Postal Service's charge and control,
where they can sign the petition, poll, or survey, if they so desire.
These activities, however, are still subject to other
provisions in the regulations pertaining to all parts of Postal Service
property, such as those prohibiting disturbances, soliciting contributions or
collecting private debts, campaigning for public office, vending, commercial
advertising, impeding ingress and egress, depositing or posting literature, and
setting up tables, stands, or other structures.
These regulations do not apply to municipal or other
public perimeter sidewalks, even if the Postal Service's property line extends
onto such a sidewalk, or even if there is some obligation on the part of the
Postal Service to maintain the city sidewalk, such as by removing snow. The
beginning of Postal Service-controlled space must be easily distinguishable to
members of the public by means of some physical feature. For example, a Postal
Service sidewalk that is perpendicular to the city sidewalk would indicate to
members of the public that they are entering onto Postal Service property, as
would stairs leading up to the entrance of a Post Office.
Please refer to POM section 124, Conduct on Postal
Property, and Poster 7,
Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal
Property, to review these regulations in their entirety. If you have
questions regarding this article, the conduct regulations in general, or the
application of a specific conduct regulation, please contact your Field Legal
Office for advice. (source: USPS)
INITIATIVE AND
REFERENDUM INSTITUTE, et al.,
v. UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE
(pdf)
|
back
to home page
back to Postal
News |
|